ImmiGroup

Immigration Fraud

2008-08-13T09:47:00.001-07:00

The Toronto Star has done an undercover investigation into immigration fruad by unlicensed consultants.

Take a look at our competitors who lying and steal their way to success.

Ghost Agents

2008-07-30T11:28:00.000-07:00

"Ghost Agents" are a threat to vulnerable immigration applicants seeking to make Canada their new home. CSIC, in keeping with its principal mandate of consumer protection, has produced a series of informational public service announcements that will be broadcast on television across Canada and further disseminated internationally through popular video sharing websites.

CSIC's first public service announcement regarding the threat of "Ghost Agents" is now online at www.csic-scci.ca.

The video (by CSIC) is available in several other important languages, including French, Chinese, Urdu, Punjabi, and Spanish. Both French and English versions of the piece will start running on national Canadian broadcast networks in short order.

Some of the popular websites featuring the public service announcement on "Ghost Agents" produced by the Canadian Society of Immigration Consultants are:

YouTube

Google Video

AOL UnCut Video

New Services Being Offered

2008-07-25T08:29:00.000-07:00

immiGroup is proud to announce the addition of new services:

CANPASS, Corporate, Air, Boat and Remote Area passes

Check back in the coming days for more information on our website, http://www.immigroup.com

If you require immediate assistance, please call 416-962-2623

HOW TO CROSS THE BORDER FOR YOUR WEDDING CEREMONY

2008-07-24T10:52:00.000-07:00

Getting married in Canada to a Canadian citizen? If you mention this as the reason for entering Canada, the officer at the port of entry may not be satisfied that your stay in Canada is of a temporary nature and you could be refused entry into the country. How, then, is it possible to be allowed into Canada for your wedding ceremony? Following are some helpful tips that can increase your chances of being allowed into Canada and get married.

1) Show strong ties to your home country: Any person who wants to get a visitor visa to Canada must provide evidence that they have strong ties to return to their home country. You have to do the same. You should bring with you enough documents to show officers at the point-of-entry that you have to leave Canada. These include a letter from work stating you need to return, proof of a house/apartment where you live, and financial information. Carry phone numbers of persons who can verify your information (most importantly, your employer). Try and travel on a day when they would be able to answer the phone. Officers at the point-of-entry may ask you why you are getting married in Canada and not where you live or somewhere else.
2) The shorter, the better: If your plan was to come to Canada, get married, and spend 3 months in the country, chances are that officers at the point-of-entry will be suspicious with your intent as a visitor. On the other hand, you can help your case by showing you will get married and leave within a week or two.
3) Avoid the U-Haul: If you are entering Canada as a visitor it is not advisable to bring all your belongings when you come in. Only bring what you would need for the visit.
4) Don’t pretend you don’t know about the sponsorship: Chances are that if you are getting married to a Canadian citizen, you know something about the sponsorship process. It is best to be proactive and acknowledge the fact. Just make sure you say that you are just coming for the ceremony and, along with your documents, show that you need to return to your home country.
5) You don’t need a six-month stay: Normally, a visitor to Canada is allowed a six-month stay in the country. If you just want to get married, you have to be willing to accept a shorter stay in the country.

The most important thing to keep in mind is that the officer at the point-of-entry can have concerns about the purpose of your trip. These tips are intended to help you ease the officer’s concerns but are no guarantee.

Immigration Tragedy: Run-away Spouses, Shattered Lives

2008-07-22T07:08:00.000-07:00

Around the office, it is a familiar story. Canadian visits foreign country, Canadian falls in love. Cuba, Vietnam, Russia - the destination doesn’t matter. Every day, thousands of Canadians are on vacation. Many of them will find what they believe to be their soul mate; that man or woman to share the rest of their life with. For many, the dream is true. For the rest, their highest hopes will turn into their worst nightmares.

In our office, the story has become all too common to cause anymore shock. Tales of theft, alleged assaults and threats are common. Two months ago, a client who brought their Cuban spouse to Canada returned after work to their home only find thousands of dollars missing and the spouse no where to be found. After reporting the theft and filing a missing persons report, he was told charges were being levelled against him. The allegation? The client threatened his wife with death.

Who is telling the truth is irrelevant. One way or the other, each spouse has found themselves in a difficult situation that could have been avoided. Both spouses are responsible for protecting their own interests.

Individuals interested in marriage and spousal sponsorship must be aware of the potential consequences of entrusting their well-being with another.
Foreign marraiges are particularly vulnerable to abuse because of the legal undertaking the sponsoring partner makes, and the dependance of the sponsored partner on their spouse.

If you are considering a foreign marriage, both partners should:

1. Have spent a good amount of time with their partner and be aware of warning signs of abuse or deceit
2. Ensure that they (individually) have enough money to support themselves
3. Sign a prenuptial agreement
4. Keep records of the marriage and sponsorship

Warning signs include:

1. A significant age gap. Though not always indicative of future abuse, a significant age gap between oneself and ones partner may be a warning sign of trouble.
2. The sponsored partner puts significant pressure on the sposoring partner to complete the process as quickly as possible. Again, though not always indicative of future abuse, the sponsoring partner is encouraged to objectively analyze the situation.
3. Unwillingness to commit to long term plans, such as children or purchasing a house.
4. Meeting online. Always spend a good amount of time with individuals who you meet online. While one may like to believe that interest is genuine (and it might well be) the cost of either sponsoring someone or being sponsored by someone with ill intent could be devastating.
5. Quick temper. Spouses who have not spent a great deal of time (such as dating, living together before marriage, etc.) with eachother can be vulnerable to abuse. If your partner is quick to anger, be aware of the potential consequences.
6. Willingness to get married very quickly
7. Desire to have shared assets

Not all foreign marriages are fradulent. Likewise, not all fraudlent marriages are preventable. Be aware, take precautions against possible abuse and be aware of your obligations and options to your partner.

immiGroup is expanding!

2008-07-08T13:03:00.000-07:00

immiGroup is expanding to deliver the best service possible to our clients. Please, explore our new information portals. Comment, criticize - ask questions!

http://twitter.com/immigroup
http://ca.answers.yahoo.com - Search for immigroup
Second life: Immi Footman
www.youtube.com/user/immigroup

Check back soon for more!

Letters From Afar

2008-05-22T09:10:00.001-07:00

A couple of days ago, a friend of mine (lets call him.. Hector) living in the United States told me that his brother was rejected for a US non-immigrant visitor visa. The brother owns a house in his home country, has a permanent job, bank accounts and other evidence of his intent to return home on completion of the visit. Despite providing documentation to establish the validity of his US Visa application, he was rejected.

If I had know that Hector was inviting his brother for a visit to the States, I would have given him an extra piece of advice: write him a letter of invitation. The problem with his application was the lack of resources his brother would have in the US. While he may own a home and have a permanent job in his country, neither of these things provided him with enough money to cover all of his expenses in the US. Without a letter proving that his expenses would be covered, the brother was rejected. A simple mistake and the plans fell through.

What people seem to fail to understand most about any aspect of immigration, whether it be visiting, business or immigrating to a foreign country, is that governments are all too fond of cold, hard proof. You may break down crying, you may beg, plead and barter but no amount of that will help you obtain the authorization you need if you can't prove your case. Its better to be truthful, short in your answers and let your documentation speak for itself - and keep in mind that everything takes time. Government moves very slowly.

Had Hector taken all of this into account, his brother would be with him now instead of having wasted the US Visa application fee only to be turned down. A cryin' shame... but it happens all the time.

Crossing the Border

2008-04-11T12:04:00.000-07:00

After a recent trip to the US I was at home unpacking my bags when I discovered, under layers of neatly folded clothing and supplies, a neat little pamphlet from the Transportation Security Administration. Like a calling card from a cat burglar, it was perfectly positioned at the bottom of my bag just waiting for me to discover it. Each article of clothing had been removed, searched and re-folded exactly as it had been packed; not a sock was laid astray. The mathematical way in which my bag had been searched astounded me. When one thinks "US Border Services" one does not imagine enforcement agents in kidd-leather gloves. What usually comes to mind are the pointed questions of agents at the border, car and bus searches, scrutinizing glances and walking barefoot back and forth through metal detectors. In this day in age, one can never be too careful dealing with government security officials lest your family trip be cut short by rejection or delays.

What is happening at the border?

Some might call it paranoia, others, prudence. Regardless of what you call it, the way in which we travel has changed and will continue to change. Even now, scientists are developing software that will "read" the way you walk or examine your facial expressions, technologies that will try to predict whether or not a crime is about to be committed. No longer are citizens of any country considered honest and law-abiding individuals until proven otherwise. The "good old days" of immigration and travel are long gone. It is now our job to convince others of our safety and credibility, whether or not one visits the United States or any other country in the world.

A great example of this new security culture at the border happened to me two years ago. In Spring of 2006, I traveled the US on a bus. At the border, every passenger is required to take their bags off the bus and go through a security screening. While this happens, agents board the bus to search for contraband or other evidence. Passengers often put their bags through screening machines, empty their contents or are searched by a drug dog. At the same time, one is questioned, "Where are you going? Who will you see there? What is the purpose of your visit? When are you returning? Are you bringing any prohibited items across the border?" The list goes on and on. At this particular border crossing, two gentlemen ahead of me were growing tired of the search. In their frustration, one made a joke.

"Are you bringing any prohibited items across the border?"
"Yeah, I've got a hunk of mad-cow meat in my bag."

As our bus pulled away, leaving them behind, their bags were in the process of being meticulously searched. Presumably, the border agents continued their questioning. Government does not have a sense of humour. Where other persons might ignore the joke as a tired traveler blowing off some steam, US Border Agents will not.

From personal experience, here are some tips to avoid costly rejection or delay at the border:

No matter how much your relatives or friends south of the border might enjoy that smoked ham you got for the holidays, don't bring it. Once while driving through the Border, I saw a large ham being confiscated. Keep in mind: Almost all types of meat are prohibited items
Do not make jokes. If you're tempted, remember the last time one of your "best" jokes fell flat. Then imagine missing your plane / train / bus or being late for your vacation or business meeting. The government has no sense of humour or sarcasm.
Answer questions simply, without getting into detail. There are not only a lot of people waiting to get through the border, but long answers sound suspicious.
Have all your documents at the ready.
Do not drink excessively or take drugs that may inhibit your ability to answer questions.
Be polite even if you think the Agent you are dealing with is being rude or unfair.
Be realistic about how much money you spent on your vacation or business trip. If you are bringing back hundreds or thousands of dollars in goods, lying about it could net you a serious fine or worse
Bring an appropriate amount of money with you, pre-plan where you will stay and have that address with you. Know when you will be leaving.
Carry the number of an Immigration legal firm with you to get advice in case you run into trouble at the border.

Coming Soon

2008-03-06T12:45:00.000-08:00

Watch for our upcoming section "Listen To The Industry".

Immigroup will be conducting interviews of renowned lawyers in the field of immigration and posting their knowledge and experience on our blog in the form of sound clips and videos.

You will be able to listen to legal issues ranging from immigration under humanitarian and compassionate grounds, refugee claims, to business class immigration and so much more.

2008-03-05T10:34:00.000-08:00

Canada's Population Growth fueled by immigration

2007-03-16T11:34:00.000-07:00

Immigration critical to Canadian population growth: census

Source: CBC News

Date: Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Article:

Immigrants made up the vast majority of the 1.6 million new Canadians between 2001 and 2006, giving the country the highest population growth rate among G8 countries, new census data released Tuesday suggests.
A view of the Vancouver Trade and Convention Centre from the Port of Vancouver. Just less than half the national population lives in the metropolitan areas in and around Vancouver, Montreal and Ontario's Golden Horseshoe.(Chuck Stoody/Canadian Press)
Canada's population stands at 31,612,897, with a growth rate of 5.4 per cent during that five-year period.
That's up from the four per cent growth rate in the previous census period between 1996 and 2001.
Roughly 1.2 million new immigrants made up the bulk of the population growth outlined in the latest census, while the country's native-born population increased by 400,000.

"Our natural growth rate is lower [than] in the U.S. for example. Sixty per cent of their growth rate came from natural growth," said Anil Arora, the director general of Statistics Canada's census branch.

The fertility rate for Canadian women between 15 and 49 remained an average of 1.5 children, the same rate as in the previous census period. The fertility rate in the U.S. is 2.0.

An average 240,000 newcomers per year more than compensated for Canada's flat fertility rate.

Immigration could become the only source for population growth by 2030, when the peak of the baby boomers born in the 1950s and early '60s reach the end of their lifespans.

Half of the new immigrants who came to Canada during the latest census period settled in Ontario.

Other highlights include:

Canada had a higher rate of population growth (5.4 per cent) than any other G8 country between 2001 and 2006. The population growth of the United States was second at five per cent.
Between 2001 and 2006, the vast majority of Canada's population growth took place in metropolitan areas.
Alberta and Ontario were responsible for two-thirds of Canada's population increase. Nearly all of the remaining third occurred in British Columbia and Quebec.
The rural population increased by one per cent since 2001. In 2006, slightly fewer than one in five Canadians (six million people) lived in rural areas.
Rural areas close to urban centres grew much faster (4.7 per cent) than remote rural areas (down 0.1 per cent).
Nearly half (47 per cent) of the territories' population was living in one of the three capital cities in 2006.
Urbanization continues
The data suggest the trend toward urbanization in Canada is continuing, with 90 per cent of the country's population growth concentrated in 33 metropolitan centres, said Arora.

Census data suggests the trend toward urbanization in Canada is continuing, says Anil Arora, director general of Statistics Canada's census branch.
(CBC)
Slightly less than half of the national population lives in the metropolitan areas in and around Montreal, Vancouver and Ontario's Golden Horseshoe.

Urban sprawl continues, with areas around the major municipalities reporting an 11 per cent growth rate, double the national average, said the census.

"You can see the spreading out from the urban centres is a phenomenon that continues to take hold in this country," said Arora.

The 10 fastest growing cities in Canada were:

Barrie, Ont.
Calgary
Oshawa, Ont.
Edmonton
Kelowna, B.C.
Toronto
Kitchener, Ont.
Guelph, Ont.
Abbotsford, B.C.
Moncton

The fastest-growing small towns and rural communties were Sylvan Lake, near Red Deer, Alta., and Strathmore, outside Calgary.

In contrast, the towns with the fastest-shrinking populations were Crowsnest Pass in southwestern Alberta, Marystown in Newfoundland and Kapuskasing in northern Ontario.

Alberta shows fastest growth
Of the provinces, Alberta leads the way in growth, driven by its strong oil and gas sector.

"Alberta has had a spectacular 10 per cent growth over the past five years and Ontario has had 6.6 per cent growth," said Arora.

Together, Ontario and Alberta represented 66 per cent of the country's new growth.

Saskatchewan and Newfoundland and Labrador were the only two provinces with a population decrease, while P.E.I.'s population remained unchanged.

In the North, all three territories experienced growth higher than the national average from 2001-06.

Nunavut's population grew 10.2 per cent and the Yukon increased 5.9 per cent. The population of the Northwest Territories increased 11.0 per cent, but Statistics Canada cautioned that the actual growth rate may not be that high. It said the increase is likely the result of an undercount of N.W.T. inhabitants in 2001.

Census determines policy
Arora said census counts are used to make key government policy decisions, including how to divide up roughly $62 billion in federal transfer payments to the provinces and territories.

"Census counts are primary factors in determining equalization transfer payments, health and social transfer payments, from the federal government to provinces and territories," he said.

More data from the 2006 census will be released throughout the year, including detailed information about interprovincial migration and immigration.

Canadian Visas: Approval and denial? A game of Russian Roulette

2007-01-02T11:16:00.000-08:00

The following is an email recieved from Wilberforce with respect to Visa applications that were rejected. The Applicants were performers who obviously were applying abroad. To cut to the chase, when applying for a Canadian Visa, the onus falls on the applicant to meet the following criteria: ¤ satisfy an officer that you will leave Canada ¤ show that you have enough money to maintain yourself and your family members in Canada and to return home; ¤ not intend to work or study in Canada unless authorized to do so; ¤ be law abiding and have no record of criminal activity (you may be asked to provide a Police Clearance Certificate); ¤ not be a risk to the security of Canada; ¤ produce any additional documents requested by the officer to establish your admissibility; ¤ be in good health (complete a medical examination, if required). Failure to meet the above criteria will result in a negative decision. Bruce, an Immigration Consultant in good standing with CSIC, provides his opinion as well. Kevin RODRIGUES

Dear Bruce,
I am trying to organize an event this year and I had wanted to invited several performers to come from abroad. When they went to the interview, only one of them was given the visa. All these performers were genuinely coming to perform with no strings attached. This one performer cannot perform on his own without the rest. May I know why the rest because I simply can’t comprehend why they were not given the visa?

The only clue I have is that the rest were refused because they had never traveled abroad. Is that a genuine ground to refuse someone to enter the country? And if they were not given the visa, when will they ever have the chance to make their first trip in order to get a second chance?

Wilberforce

Sponsoring wife and child - Request for Additional Information

2007-01-02T10:51:00.000-08:00

This email was recieved from Joan who forwarded a query with respect to an ongoing sponsorship file. As mentioned in a previous entry, when a Immigration officer suspects foul play, he or she may request additional documents to determine the true merits of the case. In the following scenario, the officer reviewing Joan's file is asking for her passport to verify whether he has been visiting his spouse who is abroad.

Since the applicant was previously married, the officer is also requesting a copy of the death certificate. In this way, the officer can proceed with the file. If Joan lied on his application and he is still married to his wife who in reality is still alive and well, he MUST provide a divorce judgement. In reality, the officer is trying to determine if Joan is still married to his ex-wife. If he is, he is not eligible to sponsor his wife abroad.

Also worth noting is the fact that there is a son who is also being sponsored by Joan. The officer has also requested Joan to provide a DNA test. This is not unusual. Again, the officer is simply trying to determine if Joan is the father. Even though Joan might have provided a copy of his son's birth certificate which lists him as the father, documents can always be forged. The officer is simply verifying the facts of the case.

Bruce, an Immigration Consultant in good standing with CSIC, provides his opinion as well

Kevin RODRIGUES

Dear Bruce,
When I was sponsoring my wife, they asked me to submit my
passport as evidence of visiting her in my home country. There is every evidence
that my passport is lost in the process centre because they can’t find it.

Secondly, they had asked me to submit a death certificate of my
deceased wife who was dead more than two decades ago. Simply, if I have to give
them something like that, then it will be a new one, which they will not accept.
I am still waiting for the result because I keep calling to ask about my
passport which seem to been lost again and again they are asking me to do a DNA
to proof my blood relation with my son who I am sponsoring in addition to my
second wife.
Please Bruce, tell me why immigration will ask me to submit a
death certificate of someone who was dead twenty years ago? Tell me why they
need a DNA done even as I have all the documents to proof that the boy is my
real son. And again do you think it is right for them to loose my Passport? Is
there any one over and above Immigration Canada so I can report all these to
them?

Joan

Sponsoring Children: Application rejected

2007-01-02T10:43:00.000-08:00

The following is an email our office recieved from an individual named Lam. She had filed a Sponsorship application at the Canadian embassy in Tehran, Iran. Her application for sponsoring her 3 children was rejected.

Bruce, an Immigration Consultant in good standing with CSIC, provides his opinion as well

Kevin RODRIGUES

Dear Bruce,
My application has been rejected and I don’t think it is
right. The story is, I sponsored my three children to join me from Iran last
year. The reply I received after submitting the application was positive.
Nonetheless, when they went for the interview in Iran, the entire application
has been rejected simply because my eldest daughter was independent. She is of
age and she is doing her own thing. I did not expect the embassy at the foreign
country to come up with something like this. My
daughter is not twenty-two
years yet. She will soon be but at the moment she is not and plus she is not
married. Do you think Immigration has the right to reject this application even
though the Canadian Immigration have approved of my sponsoring all my three
children?
Lam

Sponsoring Spouse

2007-01-02T09:41:00.000-08:00

The following is an email recieved from Isa who is looking to sponsor a spouse. She had filed previous sponsorship applications and was asked to appear for an interview before a Citizenship and Immigration Officer. It should be noted that if a CIC officer suspects that false or misleading information was provided on the application or on any previous applications, they are free to proceed with an investigation to determine whether the person is indeed in a bona fide relationship. Any information gathered during the interview could impact the sponsorship application.

Bruce, an Immigration Consultant in good standing with CSIC, provides his opinion as well

Kevin RODRIGUES

Dear Bruce,
My background is of South East Asian community and I have come a long way to find you. Hope all will be at rest by the time you answer my questions. A few months ago I went to an interview at Immigration Canada. I was sponsoring my wife to join me here in Toronto. When I went, they asked me if I had previously been married. Of course I did not tell them about my previous relationships when I filed the forms because none of my previous affairs with those of the opposite sex were a real marriage. We never were ever wedded. We never had the chance to get a blessing from a priest, nor did we ever have any children. That means, at my age (Forty aomething), I have been in several relationships but have never been really married to any one of them.

Secondly, in my country, my mom will vehemently disagree to me marrying a woman from the tribe I want to marry if they get to know about the mere friendships I have had with those of the opposite sex before my real marriage. Of course civilization and the changing times permits anyone to make sure of the woman they want to marry in future. So there was no need for me to inform anyone about my previous elationships. After all none of them were registered. Now, my real marriage was of a proxy type and that is how I filled the forms.

When I submitted the application, little did I know that immigration would call one of my previous fiancées for questioning? Well that is what they did. So my application is on the verge of collapsing. Even as I need you to tell me about what steps I can take to fight this good fight, I will do everything possible to proof them wrong.

My question is, does Immigration expect each and every individual to be a virgin before they marry? Also do you think there was any need for me to tell immigration about my personal stories that have no relation to my real marriage? The woman they called will definitely say something negative to sabotage my real marriage because she expected me to marry her. However I did not marry her because it is to the best interest of both of us not to marry. But do you think it is fair for Immigration to ask her any questions pertinent to my sponsoring another woman? And again, do you think I will not win this war? If so, then how could I win?

Thank you.

Isa.

Dion addresses immigration, human rights

2006-12-21T08:59:00.000-08:00

SOURCE: http://www.yorkregion.com

ARTICLE:

In Cantonese and Mandarin, the name Dion translates as peace, calmness and serenity. Liberal leader Stephane Dion seems pleased with the translation.
"I love it," he said, while meeting with members of Markham's Chinese community
yesterday.

Fresh off his first few weeks as federal Liberal leader and leader of the official Opposition, Mr. Dion made a pit stop at the Federation of Chinese Canadians at the Market Village Shopping Centre. This, on a day he named his dream team, which includes former Ontario Premier Bob Rae, former education minister Gerard Kennedy and former Newmarket-Aurora Liberal candidate Martha Hall Findlay.

He named Michael Ignatieff his second in command the day before.

Fielding questions on everything from human rights in China to accreditation for new immigrants, Mr. Dion was in good spirits, often cracking jokes with the assembled media.

Flanked by Markham-Unionville MP John McCallum and Oak-Ridges MP Lui Temelkovski, Mr. Dion tried to assure those gathered he wants to solve the problems they feel are most pressing.

The Liberal leader stressed that to compete in the global economy, Canada's labour
shortage must be addressed.

"In 2010, 100 per cent of the manpower growth in Canada will come from immigration, many from Asia. I want the problem of credentials to be solved," Mr. Dion said, noting many immigrants arrive with engineering backgrounds, but end up working menial jobs.

"There are a lot of things we can do," Mr. Dion said, suggesting the government needs to put more effort into making newcomers aware of available jobs.
Mr. Dion also mentioned how important environmental initiatives are to him, adding that if the economy and environment are linked, solutions will be found to the world's problems.

"We need to improve our quality of life. We cannot miss the new industrial revolution. We need to produce more with less waste and more recycling," Mr. Dion said.

On human rights issues in China, Mr. Dion said it must be addressed and stressed how proud he was of former Prime Minister Jean Chretien when he spoke about human rights at a University in Beijing in 1998 and criticized Prime Minister Stephen Harper's approach to the issue.

"The way Mr. Harper is behaving is amateur. It's not helpful...," Mr. Dion said, adding he would deal with human rights issues, but keep the avenue for cultural
exchange open.

While mum on whether or not more money would come Ontario's way if he were prime minister, Mr. Dion vowed he would try to address every province's needs.

Amid much fanfare, Mr. Dion unveiled his name written in Chinese, quipping "the spelling is good."

"I am so pleased that Stephane Dion has come here so soon after Parliament has broken for the holidays to speak to the Chinese community and the Chinese media," Mr. McCallum said.

2006-10-11T18:58:00.000-07:00

George Laczko

2006-10-11T18:56:00.000-07:00

George Laczko He is head of Public Relations and the problem-solver in Immigroup, a private immigration firm located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. George is also responsible for our company's global marketing strategy as well as setting up business-to-business relationships. If you would like to speak with George or a representative at Immigroup, please send an email to glaczko@immigroup.com

Immigroup Immigration Services

2006-10-11T18:53:00.000-07:00

Our job is to make the government officials work as easy as possible and eliminate the chance for error. By using our www.immigroup.com, you can rest reassured that your application is thoroughly reviewed and complete. Remember, it only takes one mistake on your application for a Government official to send that back to you. We deal with law firms, travel agents, private businesses, and schools. Take a look at the testimonials section of our website to see a list of some of our partners and clients. We encourage you to give them a call and ask about our reputation. We stand committed in clarifying to you the government provisions with respect to the services we offer. Our prices are exceptionally fair. We hope you use us for years to come.

George Laczko